Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Emil Joshua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Emil Joshua

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 speedy tag removed by IP editor. This young person does pass GNG or MUSICBIO. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 07:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Page was created by an SPA and there's nothing to demonstrate notability per WP:SINGER. At best, a case of TOOSOON. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Run-of-the-mill music producer. Nothing in this article establishes either musical notability or general notability. Author may be trying to use Wikipedia as a director or for resumes, but Wikipedia is not a directory. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable, decent chance it's an autobiography, none of the sources are reliable (and most trace back to a PR outlet). GeneralNotability (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the page's creator has been perma-banned as a sock/meatpuppet of of Spread Media Global - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spreadmediaglobal. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.